|
DOQI becomes
K/DOQI
Publication
of the Dialysis Outcomes Quality Initiative (DOQI) Clinical Practice
Guidelines by the US National Kidney Foundation (NKF) in 1997
provided much needed direction for healthcare professionals caring
for patients on dialysis.
These guidelines
were based on critical appraisal of the evidence available at the
time and have recently been expanded and updated.(1,2)
Supported by an unrestricted educational grant from Amgen, the DOQI
guidelines have been translated into over 10 languages and used
as a basis for clinical performance measures across the world. During
the development of these guidelines it was recognised that efforts
to further improve outcomes for patients on dialysis needed a pre-emptive
approach with management also being directed towards individuals
with earlier stages of kidney disease who were at risk of progressing
to "end-stage" kidney failure.
Thus, in 1999,
the NKF launched the Kidney Disease Outcomes Quality Initiative
(K/DOQI) with the remit of developing evidence-based guidelines
for a broader range of patients including those with kidney disease
not requiring dialysis and with conditions that may lead to kidney
damage. The first set of Clinical Practice Guidelines to result
from this initiative covering the classification, evaluation and
stratification of chronic kidney disease has just been published
in a supplement to the American Journal of Kidney Disease.(3)
This document includes a summary of the background information available
to the work group, 15 guidelines with accompanying rationale, suggestions
for performance measures or "standards", and describes
the methods used to review the evidence.
Other guidelines
under development will be focused on therapy and will cover the
management of bone disease, dyslipidaemia and blood pressure in
all patients with chronic kidney disease, including those on dialysis
or with a functioning kidney transplant. Future topics are expected
to include cardiovascular disease in dialysis patients and kidney
biopsy [www.kdoqi.org].
The problem
of under-diagnosed chronic kidney disease
Chronic kidney
disease is a major public health problem, but is under-diagnosed
and under-treated across the world. For example, a recent US population
survey has estimated that 7.6% of Americans have a reduced glomerular
filtration rate.(4) Most of these patients are
symptom-free, at least in the early stages of their disease and
only come to medical attention as a result of routine blood testing
or analysis of urine.
Even then, clinicians
often underestimate the severity of kidney failure, thereby depriving
patients of effective therapies that may slow progression of kidney
damage, correct complications of uraemia and reduce the associated
risk of cardiovascular disease. This is not helped by the lack of
a universally agreed classification of chronic kidney disease, nor
of any clear guidance as to when to screen for and treat the various
complications that may be present. As a result, many patients are
poorly managed and present to a nephrologist only when they need
to start dialysis.
The new guidelines
This first set
of the new K/DOQI Clinical Practice Guidelines will help
to highlight the problem of undetected kidney disease. The guidelines
have been compiled by a team of experts including nephrologists,
epidemiologists, laboratory physicians, dietitians, social workers,
elderly-care physicians and family practitioners. A subgroup of
the committee included paediatric nephrologists and examined issues
specifically related to children.
The work group
set out to provide, for the first time, a classification system
for staging chronic kidney disease and evaluated the best methods
of assessing it. They also examined the association between the
level of kidney function and the development of complications and
attempted to stratify the risk of loss of kidney function with that
of developing cardiovascular disease. Their recommendations are
based on an exhaustive review of the literature and the guidelines
are graded according to the quality of the supporting evidence.
Where this is lacking, specific recommendations for areas of future
research are provided. The document is intended for use by patients,
their families, health care professionals, diagnostic laboratories,
organisations providing, purchasing or planning health care and
researchers.
Terminology
revamped
To help raise
the profile of the problem of undiagnosed kidney failure, the group
chose to abandon the term "renal", which may require interpretation
and explanation to the lay public, and have substituted the word
"kidney", which is readily understood. "Chronic kidney
disease" is used to describe conditions in which there is kidney
damage and includes patients with a normal, elevated or decreased
glomerular filtration rate (GFR). Five stages of chronic kidney
disease are recognised ranging from stage 1 (normal or increased
GFR) through to stage 5 (GFR<15ml/min/1.73m2 or requiring dialysis)
(table 1). The term "end-stage kidney failure" has been
retained to describe those individuals treated by dialysis or kidney
transplantation. Each stage of kidney disease has been linked to
an action plan to focus attention on the management priorities.
For example, patients should be evaluated and treated for uraemic
complications such as anaemia when they reach stage 3 chronic kidney
disease (GFR 30-59ml/min/1.73m2).
| Stage |
Description
|
GFR
(ml/min/1.73 m2)
|
Action
Plan |
| |
At
increased risk |
90 (with CKD risk factors) |
Screening
CKD risk reduction |
| 1 |
Kidney
damage with normal or
GFR |
90 |
Diagnosis
and treatment
Treatment of comorbid conditions
Slowing progression
CVD risk reduction |
| 2 |
Kidney
damage with mild
GFR |
60-89 |
Estimating
progression |
| 3 |
Moderate
GFR |
30-59 |
Evaluating
and treating complications |
| 4 |
Severe
GFR |
15-29 |
Preparation
for kidney replacement therapy |
| 5 |
Kidney
failure |
<15
(or dialysis) |
Replacement
(if uraemia present) |
Table 1: Patients who are at increased risk of developing
chronic kidney disease are shown in the unshaded area. Chronic
kidney disease (CKD - shaded area) is defined as either kidney
damage or GFR <60 ml/min/1.73m2 for
3 months. Kidney damage is defined as pathological abnormalities
or markers of damage including abnormalities of blood, urine tests
or imaging studies. CVD = Cardiovascular disease.
An end to
24 hour urine collections?
One aspect of
the guidelines that is likely to be controversial is the recommendation
to estimate kidney function on the basis of GFR calculated from
serum creatinine concentration using a prediction equation which
corrects for other factors such as age, gender and body size. Coupled
with the recommendation that urinary protein excretion should be
estimated on an untimed "spot" urine sample using the
albumin-to-creatinine ratio, the working group has effectively abandoned
the need for 24-hour urine collection in the majority of patients.
They argue that, based on the available evidence, measurement of
creatinine clearance using timed samples (eg, 24 hours) does not
improve the estimation of GFR over that provided by the use of the
equations. Furthermore, proteinuria in glomerular disease in primarily
due to increased urinary albumin excretion, which is readily measurable
by albumin-specific Dipstix or the ratio of albumin to creatinine
in a spot sample. The limitations of this approach are acknowledged
but the working group argue that the exact level of proteinuria
is not usually needed for clinical decision making and that "a
rough estimation of the level and changes over time is sufficient".
Such an approach may constitute a welcome change for patients and
laboratory staff, both of whom have to handle the urine samples,
but may be unacceptable to some nephrologists.
The likely
impact of K/DOQI
Judging by the
success of the earlier DOQI project, it is likely that the new K/DOQI
guidelines will have a major impact on the management of patients
with chronic kidney disease, both in and beyond the USA. Most importantly,
this new document is likely to focus attention on kidney disease
as a worldwide health problem. Assuming that this leads to improved
outcomes for such individuals, the main objective of the K/DOQI
project will have been fulfilled.
|