|
The National Kidney Foundation - Dialysis Outcome Quality Initiative
(NKF-DOQI) guidelines suggest commencing dialysis when the Kt/V
falls below 2.0 (GFR 10) unless the patient is completely free of
uraemic symptoms and oedema and shows evidence of adequate nutrition.
If patients are to commence dialysis early then timely referral
to a nephrologist is essential along with the appropriate pre-dialysis
care and education so that the patient can make an informed choice
of dialysis modality. In practice many patients are referred late
and start dialysis within a few months of referral.
These patients most often receive haemodialysis as a first (default)
treatment and rarely switch modalities thereafter. Other patients
may be receiving follow up in nephrology clinics but still do not
start dialysis in a timely fashion.
Recent unpublished data from our region suggests that:
| |
 |
34%
of patients are referred late and begin dialysis late; |
| |
 |
another
29% are referred appropriately but still begin dialysis late;
and |
| |
 |
only
37% seem to achieve a planned start on a modality of their choosing
with haemodialysis or peritoneal/dialysis access already in
situ. |
Possible advantages of an early start to dialysis are:
| |
 |
preservation
of residual renal function; |
| |
 |
improved cardiovascular status; and |
| |
 |
decreased
hospitalisation and associated costs. |
As residual renal function declines, incremental dialysis is required
to maintain small solute clearances at adequate levels. Possible
disadvantages include access failure and other dialysis related
complications including burn out and resource consumption without
benefit.
In the absence of controlled data, experiences from single center
pilot studies may demonstrate the feasibility and patient acceptability
of early start dialysis. We have analysed data on 32 patients who
have commenced dialysis on 1 exchange of peritoneal dialysis, usually
Extraneal overnight. The mean starting Kt/V was 2.09, and
the median survival on one exchange was 540 days prior to requiring
incremental dialysis with 3 patients not requiring any change in
prescription for over 2 years (see graph below).

please click image to enlarge |
All patients are still alive:
| |
 |
11
are still receiving only one exchange (duration 1 - 21 months); |
| |
 |
13
have required incremental dialysis (after 1 - 31 months on a
single exchange); |
| |
 |
five
have been given renal transplants; and |
| |
 |
three are on haemodialysis. |
Complication rates have been low with 2.6 hospital days per patient
year while on 1 exchange and the frequency of bacterial peritonitis
was only 2 episodes in 265 patient months (1 bowel perforation and
1 recognised contamination episode).
Conclusion
Our clinical experience demonstrates that in practice healthy start
is acceptable and well tolerated by patients and seems to be associated
with prolonged preservation of residual renal function at least
in some patients. The complication and hospitalisation rates are
low but only 15% of new patients over the last 3 years were suitable
and agreed to participate in this study. Early referral to nephrology
clinics and pre-dialysis education programmes may enable more patients
to start dialysis at an appropriate time on a modality of their
choice with access already insitu. This may then be associated with
improved patient outcomes.
|